Please login to reply
|
|||||
[#12716]
Written by: PokerDonk [20/01/2007, 03:29] |
|||||
spoiler discussion! so what's the deal with 3rd cousins? i thought 2nd was ok.... |
|||||
[#12718]
Written by: Brajja [20/01/2007, 04:05] |
|||||
my god you must be kidding !?!? you should be shot on sight. |
|||||
[#12720]
Written by: strom [20/01/2007, 04:36] |
|||||
pokerdonk, try to avoid your family tree if you want your offsprings to develop healthy and strong. it's not just social prudence but also geneological self-preservation. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/inbreeding |
|||||
[#12741]
Written by: DungeonRaider [20/01/2007, 06:21] |
|||||
legally, marriage between 1st cousins is illegal in many us states but some permit them (some have restrictions though). no legal restricitons on 2nd cousins marrying. relationships between 1st cousins (outside of legal marriage) are considered illegal. relationships between 2nd cousins or more distant are considered legal. laws are pretty similar in other countries too... queen elizabeth and price philip are actually second cousins (which may explain the mutant ears on prince charles). the actual definition of what's considered incest is different in many places but it's pretty universal that immediate family and 1st cousins is... beyond that it varies. genetically relationships between 2nd cousins or greater are considered to be diverse enough not to be considered a risk to the child. |
|||||
[#12758]
Written by: stdesy [20/01/2007, 09:37] |
|||||
i don't think it would have been too bad. they share one great-great-grandparent. that's probably well over 100 years of separation. |
|||||
[#12760]
Written by: rseiler [20/01/2007, 09:45] |
|||||
if anyone wants to see the final scene missing from the original release and doesn't want to be bothered downloading the proper, it's here in the "part three" section: h**p://www.nbc.com/video/rewind/full_episodes/30rock.shtml |
|||||
[#12773]
Written by: seditious [20/01/2007, 13:08] |
|||||
technically speaking, it's generally fine for 2nd cousins to procreate. it's still gross, though ;-) and uh... jenna jameson is a nasty dirty whore... gross! |
|||||
[#12783]
Written by: typhoon_2099 [20/01/2007, 15:14] |
|||||
i know people who are cousins (1st) and are married in scotland. they have 3 children and they are all wrong in the head. it's just not right. i would say 3rd cousins are ok, and 2nd maybe if you're kinda distant to begin with or something. few exceptions for that though. and 1st cousins are just non-starters. it's sick. |
|||||
[#12841]
Written by: crazyivan [21/01/2007, 01:12] |
|||||
jenna ?!? i would touch her with your dick! hey rseiler, nice job getting yourself banned and your ip added to the shitlist. another one bites the dust. and another one's gone and another one's gone... |
|||||
[#13728]
Written by: Lennalf [26/01/2007, 10:31] |
|||||
the problem has nothing to do with years. the problem is that they have a common ancestor. we count that in generations, not in years. although, while your reasoning may be flawed, your conclusion is not. their offspring would not be at a high risk for genetic defects. technically, we're all inbreeding at *some* level, except for the guy who was banging the aids monkey. |
|||||
[#13730]
Written by: Lennalf [26/01/2007, 10:37] |
|||||
i would definitely say no. 1) i'm one of those guys who finds implants to be extremely unattractive. 2) i wouldn't fuck a pornstar without a condom, and sex just isn't that fun with a condom. 3) nobody would ever believe the story anyways. |
|||||
[#13733]
Written by: Lennalf [26/01/2007, 10:50] |
|||||
did rseiler get banned just for linking to nbc\'s website? because if so, i really think you should give him another chance. his intentions were obviously good-natured. not everybody can afford the bandwidth to grab a full torrent twice (some people pay per gig or per hour) without a second thought, so being able to check that link to see how much they missed in the first place is potentially a real time- and money-saver. personally, i will grab the proper because i\'m pretty ocd, but i\'m not on dial-up or limited bandwidth. plus, his url had **\'s to prevent direct linking, so hits to that site can\'t be traced back here. he was being thoughtful and productive, even if he did break a rule. i don\'t know the history or the whole story, but please do reconsider this ban. the guy was just trying to be helpful (from what i could tell), and helpful individuals are important to keep around if we want the community to stay strong. and sorry to rseiler if you\'re a chick. english is lacking in gender-neutral terms. |
|||||
[#147588]
Written by: sCifI3001 [01/12/2010, 03:57] |
|||||
3 years old, i'd go looking for a dvdrip season pack |
|||||