[#159888]
Written by: gordon shumway [15/05/2011, 23:50]
just looked at the seed/leecher numbers for this on tpb.
1127 seeds
21466 leechers.
lol.
this show is popular.
[#159913]
Written by: Xeno360 [16/05/2011, 03:37]
i'm getting really sick of tv show creators (or even the book writer) who has to always fucking ruin a great
tv show. the first few episodes of this were great, but then... they introduce the "gays"... it seems like
every good show has a few, where they have to show their "in depth" relationship. give it a fucking break
and stop with the homo erotica!
several shows that have made me grin at many points...
spartacus
tudors
this...
ugh.
[#159920]
Written by: aroyals [16/05/2011, 04:57]
Quote by xeno360
i'm getting really sick of tv show creators (or even the book writer) who has to
always fucking ruin a great
tv show. the first few episodes of this were great, but then... they introduce the "gays"... it
seems like
every good show has a few, where they have to show their "in depth" relationship. give it a fucking
break
and stop with the homo erotica!
several shows that have made me grin at many points...
spartacus
tudors
this...
ugh.
don't watch 6 feet under or true blood then
[#159922]
Written by: Xeno360 [16/05/2011, 05:06]
yeah, i watch true blood as well. awesome show.. a side from the part where the main character (bill
compton) starts sleeping around with men for no appearant reason... its like a lot of these show are
designed by "in the closet" people. i'm so glad there is a fast forward button in vlc. (+ key). heh.
just throwing this out there but..... this is pretty much like... a chick watching a chick flick, and all of a
sudden the main character starts sleeping with her friend (whos another chick), and it pushes the limits
and goes in depth. i for one.. know for a fact.. my friends, my gf, my mom and every other woman i
know would shut the show right off. its like committing public suicide. (honestly this is why i think ratings in
some shows make such big drops in audience.)
[#159926]
Written by: sn0wy82 [16/05/2011, 06:21]
shut the fuck up you homophobic prick! sick and tired of people like you- i suppose you don't mind
all the tits and arse coz it only suites you!
[#159929]
Written by: sCifI3001 [16/05/2011, 07:06]
Quote by sn0wy82
shut the fuck up you homophobic prick! sick and tired of people like you- i suppose
you don't mind
all the tits and arse coz it only suites you!
well, i didn't even grab the pilot of this, i don't watch splattercus, vampire diaries, true blood etc
and stopped soa after about the 4th/5th ep (that was because of all the granny sex)
the reason?
if i want to watch porn, i would download it,
i do not need it forced down my throat in the disguise of entertainment, but that's just me
ps. and stopped soa after about the 4th/5th ep (that was because of all the granny sex)
[#159949]
Written by: osmosis [16/05/2011, 10:57]
wow.. just wow..
[#159951]
Written by: lilou46 [16/05/2011, 11:39]
to : sn0wy82
btw, just because a guy is expressing his dislike for homosexuality in tv shows doesnt mean you get to
diss on him dude.
i have huge respect for the gay community but i also understand that someone doesnt want to see his
favorite series being gayified simply because of wanting to get better ratings by appealing to this growing
community.
i understand the idea and concept behind it. keeping it as broad as possible to get as many viewers as
possible.
do people need to "take it and like it" ?.. definately not.
[#159952]
Written by: lilou46 [16/05/2011, 11:39]
i love this show btw..
[#159970]
Written by: Username666 [16/05/2011, 14:47]
dull boring slow tv show- so they got to shove tons of sex scenes in it from all the
lesbo/gay/bestiality aspect to fill the gap with the dismal boring plot!
[#159980]
Written by: demondiablo [16/05/2011, 16:29]
Quote by lilou46
to : sn0wy82
btw, just because a guy is expressing his dislike for homosexuality in tv shows doesnt mean you get to
diss on him dude.
i have huge respect for the gay community but i also understand that someone doesnt want to see his
favorite series being gayified simply because of wanting to get better ratings by appealing to this
growing
community.
i understand the idea and concept behind it. keeping it as broad as possible to get as many viewers as
possible.
do people need to "take it and like it" ?.. definately not.
oh now i see! so all tv shows should be made for the white, heterosexual, male, in his 20-40
demographic?
i guess i should just stop watching tv then, or just stick to bet anyways. i want to see two guys
doing the dirty about as much as the next heterosexual male but i realize that a) its a fact of life
and b) gays and lesbians want stuff that appeal to them too.
theres been a number of tv shows over the past 4 years that have started to go this route. it's
picking up in popularity and its here to stay. grow up (not nescarily talking to you), man up, and
get used to it.
unless you got some closet fantasy about banging dudes than whats to worry? fast forward through it.
that being said i love this show! the plot continues to thicken on many angles. the only downside
to the show is that even though the plot thickens its quite transparent. the execution of the
squire was blatantly obvious, as is the person who paid for his services and execution. but still
they have so much going on and so much more to come that hasnt been yet told.
definitely look forward week to week for this one.
[#160002]
Written by: kingdarko [16/05/2011, 22:34]
is this gay couple actually in the book ?
if so please stop talking about the fact their are two gay men in the tv show based on a book that has two
gay men in... it's retarded.
personally i found the older child sucking on his mothers breast more disturbing but there you go.
[#160024]
Written by: Xeno360 [17/05/2011, 02:22]
lmaoo, wow my post really stirred the turd on this thread!
first of: i am not homophobic by no means. i know plenty of gay people, being how they wanna be
doesn't bother me. having to see it and having it being stuffed into the middle of a great episode (out of
the middle of nowhere) is a different story.
sure shows would like to appeal to a larger variety, but... ecspecially the way society is now-a-days...
they are risking a lot more putting something like that into an episode then leaving it out.
i am also one who likes to share my tv viewing experiences with friends and family, so now when i'm
in a convo and am like "hey, did you see game of thrones last week? pretty cool eh?". there is no
doubt there will be the sarcastic "wow, you watch that fag show?".
not that i care what people think, but it goes to show having that kind of content does more harm than
good.
(also forgot to mention.. i wouldn't mind if they had 100 gay couples in this tv show, but really showing
the 1 guy.. shaving the other guy... and then dropping to his knees to suck him off.. that really isn't
appealing by no means..)
[#160034]
Written by: sCifI3001 [17/05/2011, 05:16]
Quote by brygdom
here's an idea:
how about not show any sex at all?
/me likes this
[#160052]
Written by: osmosis [17/05/2011, 10:14]
the sucking noise was like 5 seconds tops. don't be so dramatic. you thinking people are going to
immediately refer to it as "that fag show" is rather telling.
Quote by kingdarko
please stop talking about the fact there are two gay men in the tv show based on a
book that has two gay men in it... it's retarded.
personally i found the older child sucking on his mothers breast more disturbing but there you go.
this.
lastly, if your argument is that you'd prefer television to have no sex at all, then maybe you shouldn't
be watching hbo and showtime; save yourself and everyone else the annoyance of your becoming
offended. honestly, what did you expect?
maybe, if you're lucky, you can watch game of thrones in 5 or 10 years when tbs butchers it for
rebroadcast to conservative america.
| 1 of 2 |
