|
Please login to reply
| 3 of 3 |
|
|||||
|
[#89303]
Written by: mrperfecto [20/04/2008, 22:16] |
|||||
|
i really don't get why some people would watch anything on their computer screen. if you get the 350 mb files you can watch it on a divx/dvd player and the quality is almost dvd quality if not dvd quality |
|||||
|
[#89309]
Written by: pharmacopaeia [20/04/2008, 23:32] |
|||||
| because my computer screen is larger and nicer than my television? | |||||
|
[#89311]
Written by: NicNac [20/04/2008, 23:51] |
|||||
cos my laptop is easier to transport than my tv. |
|||||
|
[#89438]
Written by: pete116 [21/04/2008, 18:14] |
|||||
|
if you've got the money for all that - why not just buy sky/cable and a tvo and record the programs yourself? |
|||||
|
[#90184]
Written by: vi76 [26/04/2008, 08:59] |
|||||
|
battlestar.galactica.s04e03.internal.rnfo.720p.hdtv.x264-dimension http://isohunt.com/torrent_details/40927968/battlestar+galactica?tab=summary  from the nfo: -ctu's release suffers from multiple problems. random out of place video squares [not macroblocks,] improper playback speed at multiple points, chromatic issues everywhere, and overall just exceptionally poor video. [see pics and included samples.] and the last seg floats from +100 - -300 ms out... again. we are aware of their inexperience with this sort of feed, and do not know if it was for sure the source or simply poor decoding of a much better than the encode stream. so this time its internal. considering bev is now banned in that 'doc' as a source due to qualitative reasons we will assume that if it is the source's fault, you simply forgot to include it in the banned source list and were not just trying to protect your low quality, might as well stick with the dsr, source. sort the issues or drop the source, or next time it will be proper...and with 720p being about quality...we know you guys already agree. [just get help from gnarly lol 2hd or mainevent who can obviously do it right.] also please note we used a non aq rev purposefully on this and still are leaps and bounds above theirs qualitatively [both statistically and visually] during any motion, camera or on screen. so we will use the aq rev for most, but when we feel it hurts the quality [like it obviously does on extremely noisy and dark sources such as this show] we will simply ignore that doc and pre something that looks better. and yes for reasons like this we are proud to not have signed that cheating encouraging, quality deprived, lame, so called ruleset. [old size used due to old size crap original pre] enjoy more of the best ustv 264 around 
|
|||||
|
| 3 of 3 |
|
|||||
